Estudo comparativo entre diferentes técnicas de microagulhamento com vistas à redução da geração de resíduos
Carregando...
Arquivos
Data
2021-12
Autores
Orientador
Stülp, Simone
Banca
Silva, Guilherme Liberato Da
Tassinary, João Alberto Fiovarante
Bianchetti, Paula
Título do periódico
ISSN
Título do Volume
Editor
Resumo
Alterações inestéticas motivam os indivíduos a buscarem tratamentos e dentre as técnicas que podem ser utilizadas, tem-se o microagulhamento, que é realizado através de roller ou caneta elétrica, com um sistema de agulhas que geram pequenos traumas na pele e formam microcanais. O objetivo desta pesquisa é analisar as diferenças no procedimento de microagulhamento realizado com equipamento roller e o microagulhamento realizado com a caneta elétrica e verificar o volume de material gerado ao realizar o procedimento, com ambos os referidos equipamentos, com vistas ao posterior descarte desse material e o impacto ao meio ambiente. Utilizou-se metodologia com procedimento técnico através de pesquisa bibliográfica, em artigos e livros físicos e online. O estudo é do tipo experimental realizado por testes com Microscopia Eletrônica de Varredura, Espectroscopia de Infravermelho Transformada de Fourier e Microscopia digital, a fim de propiciar uma abordagem quali-quantitativa acerca das perfurações, da permeabilidade do tecido e a quantificação do material gerado. Os resultados mostram que, nas condições utilizadas neste estudo, as perfurações realizadas com o roller são mais delimitadas e criam microcanais sem arranhar o tegumento, enquanto as perfurações com caneta elétrica geram um maior número de perfurações e, ainda, identificou-se que mesmo com os mesmos parâmetros, as aplicações da caneta promovem um atrito no tecido diferente do roller, deixando marcas que se assemelham a arranhões e possivelmente, em prática clínica, o desencadeamento de efeitos adversos pós procedimento. Quanto à retenção do ácido hialurônico a diferença entre o roller e a caneta elétrica é muito sutil e, ainda, o roller gera maior quantidade de material a ser descartado quando comparado a caneta elétrica, que tem somente sua ponteira descartada. A conclusão do estudo é que as microperfurações geradas com a caneta elétrica apresentam maior número, área e perímetro em comparação ao roller e, ainda, a caneta elétrica gera menor quantidade de resíduos a ser descartado. No entanto, é preciso cuidado com a pressão na aplicação da caneta elétrica para que não sejam geradas lesões adversas.
Unaesthetic alterations motivate individuals to seek treatments and among the techniques that can be utilized, there is microneedling, which is performed using a roller or an electric pen, with a system of needles that generate small traumas on the skin and form microchannels. The purpose of this research is to analyze the differences in the microneedling procedure performed with the roller equipment and the microneedling performed with the electric pen and to verify the volume of material generated upon performing procedure with both of these equipments aiming for the subsequent disposal of this material and the impact to the environment. A technical procedure methodology was used through bibliographical research, in articles and physical and online books. The study is of the experimental type performed through tests with Scanning Electron Microscopy, Fourier-Transformed Infrared Spectroscopy and Digital Microscopy, in order to provide a quali-quantitative approach about perforations, tissue permeability and the quantification of generated material. The results show that, under the conditions used in this study, the perforations performed with the roller are more delimited and create microchannels without scratching the integument, while the perforations with an electric pen generate a greater number of perforations, and, even with the same parameters, the applications of the pen promote friction on the tissue different from the roller, leaving marks that resemble scratches and possibly, in clinical practice, the triggering post-procedure adverse effects. As for the permeability of the hyaluronic acid, the difference between roller and electric pen is very subtle, allowing the affirmation that both promote this effect; still, the roller generates a greater amount of material to be discarded when compared to the electric pen, which only has its tip discarded. The conclusion of the study is that the microperforations generated with the electric pen have a greater number, area and perimeter compared to the roller and, still, the electric pen generates less waste to be discarded. However, one must be careful with the application pressure eletric pen so that adverse injuries are not generated.
Unaesthetic alterations motivate individuals to seek treatments and among the techniques that can be utilized, there is microneedling, which is performed using a roller or an electric pen, with a system of needles that generate small traumas on the skin and form microchannels. The purpose of this research is to analyze the differences in the microneedling procedure performed with the roller equipment and the microneedling performed with the electric pen and to verify the volume of material generated upon performing procedure with both of these equipments aiming for the subsequent disposal of this material and the impact to the environment. A technical procedure methodology was used through bibliographical research, in articles and physical and online books. The study is of the experimental type performed through tests with Scanning Electron Microscopy, Fourier-Transformed Infrared Spectroscopy and Digital Microscopy, in order to provide a quali-quantitative approach about perforations, tissue permeability and the quantification of generated material. The results show that, under the conditions used in this study, the perforations performed with the roller are more delimited and create microchannels without scratching the integument, while the perforations with an electric pen generate a greater number of perforations, and, even with the same parameters, the applications of the pen promote friction on the tissue different from the roller, leaving marks that resemble scratches and possibly, in clinical practice, the triggering post-procedure adverse effects. As for the permeability of the hyaluronic acid, the difference between roller and electric pen is very subtle, allowing the affirmation that both promote this effect; still, the roller generates a greater amount of material to be discarded when compared to the electric pen, which only has its tip discarded. The conclusion of the study is that the microperforations generated with the electric pen have a greater number, area and perimeter compared to the roller and, still, the electric pen generates less waste to be discarded. However, one must be careful with the application pressure eletric pen so that adverse injuries are not generated.
Descrição
Palavras-chave
Roller; Caneta elétrica; Resíduos sólidos de saúde; Estética; Eletric pen; Solid health waste; Aesthetics
Citação
FURINI, Menahen. Estudo comparativo entre diferentes técnicas de microagulhamento com vistas à redução da geração de resíduos. 2021. Dissertação (Mestrado) – Curso de Sistemas Ambientais Sustentáveis, Universidade do Vale do Taquari - Univates, Lajeado, 08 dez. 2021. Disponível em: http://hdl.handle.net/10737/3281.